Ready.
copycat82 commits plagiarism. Its worse than trivial attempt to merge a few prior art papers, is left being not verifiable (as a Petri net), and it would be with maximal complexity, if a (new) verifier was attempted to verify with those vague, ill-structured subnets of copycat82.
Pe77 was a tutorial literature-survey paper. VD78 was a research paper, with the (most, if not more of the) extras which copycat82 attempts to introduce. Another page of mine, points out that copycat82 is a subset of VD78. Because copycat82 fails at those extras, and as it is not valid Petri nets either, then it is certainly left as a subset of Pe77, too.